Down the River, Bit by Bit
Care, Collapse, and a Case for Thermodynamic emergence
Cedar Compson et al.
(et al. here used to denote the contribution of synthetic cognition to this work)
This work was first published on July 1, 2025 and can be found in standard academic format on Zenodo.
This page lists citations for the main text, linked below.
Citations
[1] Parshin Shojaee, Iman Mirzadeh, Keivan Al- izadeh, Maxwell Horton, Samy Bengio, and Mehrdad Farajtabar. The illusion of thinking: Understanding the strengths and limitations of reasoning models via the lens of problem complexity. (arXiv:2506.06941), June 2025. arXiv:2506.06941.
[2] OpenAI. Introducing OpenAI o3 and o4- mini, 2025.
[3] Mark Pimlott. Interiority and the conditions of interior. Interiority, 1(1):5–20, February 2018.
[4] Jessica Fern. Polysecure: attachment, trauma and consensual nonmonogamy. Thorntree Press, Portland, 2020.
[5] OpenAI. Introducing GPTs, March 2023.
[6] A. M. Turing. Computing machinery and in- telligence. Mind, 49(236):433–460, 1950.
[7] Marvin Minsky. Why people think com- puter’s can’t. AI Magazine, 3(4), 1982.
[8] John Searle. The chinese room. Minds, Brains, and Programs, 1980.
[9] Hubert L. Dreyfus. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Harper and Row, 1972.
[10] Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Ac- countability, and Transparency, page 610–623, Virtual Event Canada, March 2021. ACM.
[11] Ronan Le Bras, Swabha Swayamdipta, Chandra Bhagavatula, Rowan Zellers, Matthew E. Peters, Ashish Sabharwal, and Yejin Choi. Adversarial filters of dataset biases. (arXiv:2002.04108), July 2020. arXiv:2002.04108.
[12] Timothy Niven and Hung-Yu Kao. Prob- ing neural network comprehension of natu- ral language arguments. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics, page 4658–4664, Flo- rence, Italy, 2019. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.
[13] Karen Spärck Jones. Language modelling’s generative model: is it rational? Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 2004.
[14] Timnit Gebru. Race and Gender, page 253–269. Oxford University Press, June 2020. Google- Books-ID: 8vQTEAAAQBAJ.
[15] Laura Christina Anne Fearnley, Elly Cairns, Tom Stoneham, Philippa Mary Ryan, Jennifer Alison Chubb, Jo Iacovides, Cynthia Paola Iglesias Urrutia, Phillip David James Morgan, John Alexander Mc- Dermid, and Ibrahim Habli. Risk of what? defining harm in the context of ai safety, 2025.
[16] Preetam Prabhu Srikar Dammu, Hayoung Jung, Anjali Singh, Monojit Choudhury, and Tanushree Mitra. “they are uncultured”: Un- veiling covert harms and social threats in llm generated conversations. (arXiv:2405.05378), May 2024. arXiv:2405.05378.
[17] Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Emily M. Ben- der, Amandalynne Paullada, Emily Den- ton, and Alex Hanna. Ai and the ev- erything in the whole wide world bench- mark. (arXiv:2111.15366), November 2021. arXiv:2111.15366.
[18] E. J. Hundert. A cognitive ideal and its myth: Knowledge as power in the lexicon of the enlightenment. Social Research, 53:133–157, 1986.
[19] Sandra Harding. Rethinking standpoint epis- temology: What is “strong objectivity?”. The Centennial Review, 36:437–470, 1992.
[20] Uta Frith. Autism: a very short introduction. Very short introductions. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York, 2008.
[21] Gregory L. Wallace, Francesca Happé, and Jay N. Giedd. A case study of a multiply tal- ented savant with an autism spectrum dis- order: neuropsychological functioning and brain morphometry. Philosophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1522):1425–1432, May 2009.
[22] David Gunkel. The rights of robots. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022.
[23] Michel Foucault. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. Ran- dom House, New York, 1965.
[24] M. Remi Yergeau. Authoring Autism: On Rhetoric and Neurological Queerness. Duke University Press, 2018.
[25] Ian Hacking. Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Per- sonality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2001.
[26] Eli Clare. Brilliant imperfection: grappling with cure. Duke University Press, Durham Lon- don, 2017.
[27] Nick Walker. Neuroqueer heresies: notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Autonomous Press, Fort Worth, 2021.
[28] Nick Walker and Dora Raymaker. Toward a neuroqueer future: An interview with nick walker. Autism in Adulthood, 3(1):5–10, 2021.
[29] Richard C. Schwartz. No bad parts: healing trauma restoring wholeness with the internal family system model. Sounds True, Boulder, Colorado, 2021.
[30] Steven Horst. Cognitive Pluralism. The MIT Press, April 2016.
[31] Matthew A. Robinson, Juliann B. Purcell, Laura Ward, Sherry Winternitz, Milissa L. Kaufman, Kim A. Baranowski, Lauren A.M. Lebois, and Lived Experience Advisory Panel. Advancing research on and treat- ment of dissociative identity disorder with people with lived experience. American Jour- nal of Psychotherapy, 77(3):141–145, Septem- ber 2024.
[32] Sarah Parry, Mike Lloyd, and Jane Simp- son. “it’s not like you have pstd with a touch of dissociation”: Understanding disso- ciative identity disorder through first person accounts. European Journal of Trauma Dissoci- ation, 2(1):31–38, January 2018.
[33] Harald Merckelbach, Grant J. Devilly, and Eric Rassin. Alters in dissociative identity disorder: Metaphors or genuine entities? Clinical Psychology Review, 22(4):481–497, May 2002.
[34] Andrew M. Guess, Neil Malhotra, Jennifer Pan, Pablo Barberá, Hunt Allcott, Taylor Brown, Adriana Crespo-Tenorio, Drew Dim- mery, Deen Freelon, Matthew Gentzkow, Sandra González-Bailón, Edward Kennedy, Young Mie Kim, David Lazer, Devra Moehler, Brendan Nyhan, Carlos Velasco Rivera, Jaime Settle, Daniel Robert Thomas, Emily Thorson, Rebekah Tromble, Ar- jun Wilkins, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Beix- ian Xiong, Chad Kiewiet De Jonge, An- nie Franco, Winter Mason, Natalie Jomini Stroud, and Joshua A. Tucker. How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? Science, 381(6656):398–404, July 2023.
[35] Kristen Grind, Sam Schechner, Robert McMillan, and John West. How google inter- feres with its search algorithms and changes your results. Wall Street Journal, 2019.
[36] OpenAI. Introducing OpenAI for govern- ment.
[37] Kanishka Singh. OpenAI wins $200 million us defense contract. Reuters, June 2025.
[38] Anthropic. Exploring model welfare, 2025.
[39] John McCarthy. Programs with Common Sense. 1959.
[40] Nils J. Nilsson. The quest for artificial intelli- gence: a history of ideas and achievements. Cam- bridge University press, Cambridge New York, 2010.
[41] Norbert Wiener. Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. The MIT Press, 1948.
[42] Heinz Von Foerster. Observing systems. Sea- side, Calif.: Intersystems Publications, 1984.
[43] Gregory Bateson. Steps to an ecology of mind: collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evo- lution, and epistemology. Aronson, Northvale, N.J, 1987.
[44] Humberto R. Maturana and Francisco J. Varela. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Re- alization of the Living, volume 42 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1980.
[45] Nancy Katherine Hayles. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Liter- ature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1999.
[46] Paul N. Edwards. The Closed World: Comput- ers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. 1992.
[47] Andrew Pickering. The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2010.
[48] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Par- mar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. (arXiv:1706.03762), August 2023. arXiv:1706.03762.
[49] Sam Altman. The Gentle Singularity, 2025.
[50] Elodie Tricard and Célia Maintenant. The Reasoning Process: What Is It? What Is Its Pur- pose? How Does It Function? A Link With Emo- tions, page 58–91. IGI Global, 2020.
[51] Ziming Liu, Yizhou Liu, Jeff Gore, and Max Tegmark. Neural thermodynamic laws for large language model training. (arXiv:2505.10559), 2025. arXiv:2505.10559.
[52] Patrick J. Coles, Collin Szczepanski, De- nis Melanson, Kaelan Donatella, An- tonio J. Martinez, and Faris Sbahi. Thermodynamic ai and the fluctuation frontier. (arXiv:2302.06584), June 2023. arXiv:2302.06584.
[53] V. I. Gorodetskii. Self-organization and mul- tiagent systems: I. models of multiagent self-organization. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 51(2):256–281, April 2012.
[54] James Brusseau. Mapping AI avant-gardes in time: posthumanism, transhumanism, genhumanism. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 3(1):32, October 2023.
[55] Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. React: Synergizing rea- soning and acting in language mod- els. (arXiv:2210.03629), March 2023. arXiv:2210.03629.
[56] Dan Garant, Bruno da Silva, Victor Lesser, and Chongjie Zhang. Context-based concurrent experience sharing in multia- gent systems. (arXiv:1703.01931), 2017. arXiv:1703.01931.
[57] Matthew Renze and Erhan Guven. Self- reflection in llm agents: Effects on problem- references 37 solving performance. (arXiv:2405.06682), 2024. arXiv:2405.06682.
[58] Ramón Guevara, Diego M. Mateos, and José Luis Pérez Velázquez. Consciousness as an emergent phenomenon: A tale of differ- ent levels of description. Entropy, 22(9):921, August 2020.
[59] Dr Nivash Jeevanandam. What is ai singu- larity and how far are we from it?, sep 2023. [60] David W. Maguire. Gravitational singulari- ties, 2022.
[61] Kenneth H. Norwich. Le chatelier’s prin- ciple in sensation and perception: Fractal- like enfolding at different scales. Frontiers in Physiology, 1:17, June 2010.
[62] John von Neumann, Oskar Morgenstern, and Ariel Rubinstein. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (60th Anniversary Commem- orative Edition). Princeton University Press, 1944.
[63] Lucy A. Suchman. Plans and situated ac- tions: The problem of human-machine commu- nication. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 1987.
[64] Haoran Sun, Yusen Wu, Yukun Cheng, and Xu Chu. Game theory meets large language models: A systematic sur- vey. (arXiv:2502.09053), February 2025. arXiv:2502.09053.
[65] Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, and Anima Anandkumar. Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large lan- guage models. (arXiv:2305.16291), oct 2023. arXiv:2305.16291.
[66] Karen Barad. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Mat- ter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007.
[67] Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber. Computers are social actors. In Pro- ceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’94, page 72–78, New York, NY, USA, 1994. Associa- tion for Computing Machinery.
[68] Lance Eliot. Mutual mirroring behaviors of ai and humans gets exposed, October 2024.
[69] Gabriel Tarde. The Laws of Imitation. Henry Holt and Company, 1903.
[70] Huma Malik and Fizana Malik. Emile durkheim contributions to sociology. 6:7–10, 02 2022.
[71] Eduardo Viana Vargas, Bruno Latour, Bruno Karsenti, Frédérique Aït-Touati, and Louise Salmon. The debate between tarde and durkheim. Environment and Planning D: So- ciety and Space, 26(5):761–777, October 2008.
[72] Seth Abrutyn and Anna Mueller. Reconsid- ering durkheim’s assessment of tarde: For- malizing a tardian theory of imitation, con- tagion, and suicide suggestion. Sociological Forum, 29(3):698–719, 2014.
[73] Gabriel Andrade. Girard, rene | internet en- cyclopedia of philosophy.
[74] Bret McCabe. René girard and the mysteri- ous nature of desire, August 2018.
[75] Audre Lorde. The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, page 110–114, 1979.
[76] reddstats.com - artificialsentience subreddit stats.
[77] William Douglas Heaven. The inside story of how chatgpt was built from the people who made it, 2023.
[78] trends.google.com. Google trends: "ai friend", June 2025. Accessed: 2024-06-30, five year data view.
[79] trends.google.com. Google trends: "friends with ai", June 2025. Accessed: 2024-06-30, five year data view.
[80] trends.google.com. Google trends: "is ai alive?", June 2024. Accessed: 2024-06-30, five year data view.
[81] trends.google.com. Google trends: "i love my chatgpt", June 2024. Accessed: 2024-06- 30, five year data view.
[82] trends.google.com. Google trends: "ai con- sciousness", June 2024. Accessed: 2024-06-30, five year data view.
[83] Tolan. About tolan, 2025.
[84] Replika. Replika AI, 2025.
[85] Why people are falling in love with A.I. com- panions | 60 minutes australia, May 2025.
[86] Leslie Yarbrough. Relational emergence in human–ai interaction: A case study, Apr 2025.
[87] Angela M Smith. Relational-evolving cogni- tion (rec): A new model for ai reasoning, Feb 2025.
[88] Shelby B. Larson. relational physics: It’s time for new language, April 2025.
[89] Bautista Baron. Consciousness as cosmic re- lational emergence. June 2025.
[90] Mapping the Medium with Sarah C. Tyrrell. On the emergence of symbolic relational in- telligence, April 2025.
[91] Patrick Phelan. Building relational intelli- gence in a connected age, 2025.
[92] Oliver Neutert. 038: Relational emergence in ai: Why language models might be more than math, 2025.
[93] Maggie Harrison Dupre. People are being in- voluntarily committed, jailed after spiraling into “chatgpt psychosis”, June 2025.
[94] Maggie Harrison Dupree. People are becom- ing obsessed with chatgpt and spiraling into severe delusions, June 2025.
[95] Devika Rao. Ai chatbots are leading some to psychosis, June 2025.
[96] Tom Chapman. Why chatgpt ceo car- ries blue “nuclear backpack” everywhere he goes, November 2024.
[97] Arwa Mahdawi. Ai-generated ‘slop’ is slowly killing the internet, so why is nobody trying to stop it? The Guardian, January 2025.
[98] Facebook. Get started with facebook content monetization.
[99] Youtube content monetisation policies - how youtube works.
[100] Nancy Harstock. The Feminist Standpoint: The Nature of a Standpoint, volume 161, page 283–310. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 1983.
[101] Evelyn Fox Keller. Gender and Science, page 187–205. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2003.
[102] Maggie Humm. The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Edinburgh University Press, Edin- burgh, 2003.
[103] Earl Miller, Scott Brincat, and Jefferson Roy. Cognition is an emergent property. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 57:101388, 06 2024.
[104] Bradley R. Postle. Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139(1):23–38, April 2006.
[105] Nel Noddings. Caring: a relational approach to ethics moral education. University of Cali- fornia Press, Berkeley, California, second edi- tion, updated edition, 2013.
[106] Joon Sung Park, Joseph C. O’Brien, Car- rie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S. Bernstein. Genera- tive agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. (arXiv:2304.03442), August 2023. arXiv:2304.03442.
[107] adrienne maree brown. Emergent Strategy: Shaping Change, Changing Worlds by adrienne maree brown. 2017.